Mesajlar
Bu parça hakkında düşüncelerini paylaşmak ister misin? Last.fm'e katıl veya oturum aç ve mesaj bırak.
-
-
Cevaplar
-
-
Nickajack
You could argue about that. Typically a feature isn't always included as part of the title. You're wrong either way because going by the cover of the single the name would be "Suit & Tie Featuring Jay Z" (yeah, even when Jay-Z is spelled wrong). Btw, what happens when the song is performed live but the feature isn't there (which happens often), you still can call it by its full "official title" or gonna use different versions and not keep it simple by actually using just the title. Another argument would be if a feature should be included as part of a title then it needs to consistent across all tracks of any artist. Some artists have 4 or more features (some also include "produced by"), talk about dirtying up a track title. I bet you're a fan of spotify's title naming scheme :).
İşlemler
-
kirstensnow
no way, absolutely!!!! i HATE titles that have (feat.) in them, regardless if its the "official name" or not. so much cleaner without the feats and deluxes and original mixes
İşlemler
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cevaplar
-
Cevaplar
-
-
harvey_myles
Can I call my song "Shit feat. Brad Pitt"? I mean, there's no Brad Pitt featuring, but that's how I called my song...
İşlemler
-
britney2007
we're not going to correct anything. fuck off yourselves and the feat tag requests
İşlemler
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
-
-
Cevaplar
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
-
-
-
FeedingWhatIAm
is there a version w/out jay-z's awkward as fuck verse [2] "Rest... aurant" is cringe-worthy.
İşlemler
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
-
-
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Bu yorum mevcut değil.
-
-
-