sublimewreckage

29, Male, United StatesLast seen: Saturday morning

33590 plays since 14 May 2007

0 Loved Tracks | 3 Posts | 0 Playlists | 59 shouts

  • Add as friend
  • Send a message
  • Leave a shout

Your musical compatibility with sublimewreckage is Unknown

Get your own music profile

Recently Listened Tracks

|

Top Artists

1 Play
1,293
2  
1,264
3 Play
1,116
4  
974
5  
963
6  
707
7  
666
8  
628
9  
575
10 Play
515
11 Play
481
12  
478
13 Play
446
14  
434
15  
400
16  
367
17  
363
18 Play
358
19  
323
20  
319
21 Play
309
22 Play
305
23  
295
24  
292
25  
283
26 Play
264
27 Play
243
28 Play
240
29 Play
235
30  
230
31 Play
228
32 Play
215
33 Play
214
34 Play
212
35 Play
206
36 Play
202
37 Play
199
37 Play
199
39  
189
40 Play
187
40  
187
42 Play
186
43  
185
44  
181
45  
176
46 Play
169
47 Play
167
48  
165
49  
164
50 Play
160
See more

Shoutbox

Leave a comment. Log in to Last.fm or sign up (it’s free).
See all 59 shouts

About Me

..
...
MY TRADELIST
...
..










I like whatever pleases my ears; I don't restrict myself from certain types of music. It's varied and it comes down to personal taste.. but most of it all it's never about trend, politics, or all else that affects people's judgment when selecting music to listen to.

That said, I don't care if bands aren't original; if an album has attitude, musicianship and well written material I'm going to enjoy it, derivative or not. Sacrificing production quality to hide the flaws in your musicianship or to create an atmosphere that isn't there is ridiculous. There are less than perfect production qualities that may well add to some bands' "atmosphere" (in turn their mystique), and that is great. But to deliberately sabotage your sound for some ideal which ultimately appeases in the eyes of the most narrow-minded seems whorish, not elitist (and therefore trendier than a band who, say, uses keyboards in attempt to tastefully, or intelligently expand the depth of their atmosphere). Certainly more whorish than a band that tightens sound quality over time (through maturity, practice, etc.) and garners a growth in fan-base or record sales as a result (not at some record label's behest or band's master-plan for pop-chart domination like some whiny faggots would have you believe). With that in mind, this isn't a declaration of love for all things Cradle of Filth or Dimmu Borgir-like either; or a justification for what I would consider poor taste... merely an observation into the stupid, memetic behavior of the self-proclaimed "free thinking", "underground" crowd.

Anyways, it's always been about the music; philosophy, politics, and popularity be damned.

BTW - If you feel it was hypocritical to cite Dimmu Borgir or Cradle of Filth before, allow me the chance to explain... that the truth, and miracle, is that people can, and do, independently come to their own conclusions... including one that writes a good portion of Dimmu, and pretty much all CoF, discs off as rubbish. For me Enthrone Darkness Triumphant and Godless Savage Garden narrowly escape being called rubbish (well, at least 10 years ago this may have been true... as my cd collection bears evidence of). What I'm trying to say is, its OK to like or dislike these bands, as long as you don't really give a shit what choice you made, and that the decision was based solely on whether those bands are "music to your ears", or not.

The truth is this "about me" could have, and should have, been easily avoided. These words aren't revelations, they're just indicative of those in need of an all-powerful, 50 foot hand to slap the sense back into them for somehow managing to avoid the reality of such a simple tenet.