Lyrant

Izzystone wrote:

Are you serious?

Reply

Teslacaster wrote:

It's impossible, and I like the name Tesla.

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

U2 still are simplistic. I think you're missing MY point here. They don't have any complex songs and they are not over-technical. My point is that you don't have to be insanely technically skilled to write good songs.

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

There's a lot of difference between an unchanged note and just simplitstic music in general. U2 is regarded one of the best rock bands in the world, they are not over-technically skilled or complex.

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

Nope, complexity and difficulty does not have to mean that the music is good. Remember something called songwriting. If a band is technical and shit, but are not able to make any good melodies or good songs, what good are all the skills then ?

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

Exactly, because composition or complexity doesn't mean that the music has good quality!

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

No, we can't. That's the beauty of it. Noone have the right or the power to judge what's the better or worse in music. If this was the case, then Lady gaga is the most talented artist in the world.

Reply

Izzystone wrote:

That, as I said, depends on the situation, because there's no such thing as a pure fact when it comes to music. Everyone have different views. If one thinks Korn is the best band on the planet, there's nothing wrong with that. If one thinks Korn is the only good band on the planet and claims that there are no other talented bands out there, then one's wrong.

Reply