Gary Glitter

JoeDoeOwns wrote:

what a creep..

View Profile | Leave JoeDoeOwns a shout

JckKrc wrote:

He's a nonce, a perv, a slot badger, a two pin plug, a bush dodger, a small bean regarder, a una bummer, a nut administrator and a bent ref. He's The Crazy World of Arthur Brown and a fence vole. He's free willy, a chimney bottler a bunty man and a shrub rocketeer.

View Profile | Leave JckKrc a shout

jamesisace93 wrote:

I hope that he has a comeback tour one day. I know ill go! :) woop woop (8) Hello Hello Its good to be back its good to be back (8)

View Profile | Leave jamesisace93 a shout

Glamypunk wrote:

@redcrush well, I have to admit that my first post can easily be misunderstood. I always believed in Michael's innocence in this case as in many other cases. It is easy to see when people want to take revenge or make money. But Michael's behaviour was more than strange, so it was easy to put him into suspicion. Which leads us to the case Gary Glitter. He had illegal material on his laptop. I believe that to be true, though Gary always denied that. Also he denied having sex knowingly with underages in Vietnam. The court was taken behind closed doors and all proves the judges had were the sayings of the girls, who claim to be attacked sexually. They changed their accusation after they got money from GG. And, maybe you know, it is absolute usual in Vietnam to simulate a carcrash or to ascribe a crime to europeans to get money from them. So some doubts remain...

View Profile | Leave Glamypunk a shout

xSTEx wrote:

What sparkles like a diamond and is small enough to fit in a schoolgirl's ring? Gary Glitter

View Profile | Leave xSTEx a shout

redcrush wrote:

@polymorphous71: I fail to understand what my taste in music, or avatar, has to do with the facts. The fact of the matter is that Glamypunk still has no clue about what they're talking about or understands the deliberate use of my use of caps lock. Also, I happen to like the kind of music I like so why not just respect that instead of trying to attack me for it? I'm not here dissing yours. Thanks.

View Profile | Leave redcrush a shout

polymorphous71 wrote:

Yeah but redcrush, it could be said that your fascination with MJ is a tad disturbing. I mean, even your avatar mate!?! Have a bit of imagination (I've seen your taste in music so, give the whole 'imagination thing' a whirl at least).

View Profile | Leave polymorphous71 a shout

redcrush wrote:

@Glamypunk: lol You are the first person I ever met online who said that. I'm assuming that you are just a generally ignorant person if you can not to understand something so simple as my deliberate use of the caps lock key.

View Profile | Leave redcrush a shout

redcrush wrote:

@Glamypunk: Do us a favor and actually KNOW what you're talking about before you start sprouting off your uneducated opinions. There was NO evidence in Michael's case and plenty against Gary Glitter. If the FBI couldn't find anything on him what makes you think that you can? Oh that's right. b/c of you can't, because you have no clue about what you're talking about.

View Profile | Leave redcrush a shout

Glamypunk wrote:

@thatspicegirl completely wrong, the main difference between the 2 cases is in my opinion that Michael had more money and his case wasn't courted in Vietnam, nothing much else. I am sure both are/were crazies, if not more.... noone will ever know the truth perhaps. Me, I don't believe in american justice and in vietnamese even less.

View Profile | Leave Glamypunk a shout

polymorphous71 wrote:

xSTEx, well done for swearing and being a big man online. Easy to call someone a fucking moron when you aint in the same space as them.

View Profile | Leave polymorphous71 a shout

VEO15 wrote:

I use his music to lure prey

View Profile | Leave VEO15 a shout

Super_Jesus wrote:

thatspicegirl got it spot in. Annoying thing is I really like Gary Glitter's music but feel guilty listening to it =/

View Profile | Leave Super_Jesus a shout

thatspicegirl wrote:

Why do you risk getting banned when you bash Michael on his page? Um, because he was PROVEN innocent WITH SOLID EVIDENCE and was a truly kind person who was taken advantage due to his generosity. The case against Michael was complete bullshit made up by psycho money-hungry parents. Glitter was PROVEN guilty WITH SOLID EVIDENCE. There was nothing to gain from accusing Glitter, while there was so much to gain from accusing Michael. When Michael's INSURANCE COMPANY (Not Michael himself, contrary to popular belief) offered the accuser's father (Who has since committed suicide) a $20 million settlement, suddenly everything was fine and he was no longer concerned with taking Michael to court. Tells you something there. Glitter did it because he was a pedophile. Michael was innocent because he was not. It's simple, really.

View Profile | Leave thatspicegirl a shout

thatspicegirl wrote:

There was evidence for Gary Glitter, their wasn't any actual evidence in Jacksons case you fucking moron [2]. Precisely. Howeverrrr, it requires too much for MJ haters to read into MJ's case and see he was innocent. Glitter = guilty. Michael = Victim of extortion; should never have even been accused in the first place.

View Profile | Leave thatspicegirl a shout

alexia_N wrote:

░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓█░░░░██▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░▓▓████▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░▓░ ░░░░░░░▓▓██▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░█▓░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░█▓░░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░█████░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░████░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓░▓▓░▓▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓█▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓███▓█▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░ PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO

View Profile | Leave alexia_N a shout

xSTEx wrote:

@polymorphous71 Their was evidence for Gary Glitter, their wasn't any actual evidence in Jacksons case you fucking moron.

View Profile | Leave xSTEx a shout

xSTEx wrote:

░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓█░░░░██▓░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░▓▓████▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░▓█░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███░░░░░▓░ ░░░░░░░▓▓██▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░█▓░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░█▓░░ ░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░░ ░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██████▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓████▓▓▓░░░ ░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░█████░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░████░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█░░░░░░░█░░░░░░█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░ ░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓█▒▒▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░ ░░░▓░▓▓░▓▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓█▒▒▒▒█▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓░░ ░░░░░░░░░░░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓███▓█▓▓▓▓▓░░░░░░░░░ PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO PEDO

View Profile | Leave xSTEx a shout