Skip to
YouTube video

Loading player…

Related Tags

Near the end of 2001, the band reconvened to record their fourth album. After spending four months in a Los Angeles studio completing the album, Grohl spent some time helping Queens of the Stone Age complete their 2002 album Songs for the Deaf. Once the Queens of the Stone Age album was finished, Grohl, inspired by the sessions, decided to reconvene Foo Fighters to rework a few songs on their album. Instead, they re-recorded nearly all of the album (save… read more

Tracklist

Shoutbox

Leave a comment. Log in to Last.fm or sign up.

  • Avatar for mrpaul01
    This album isn't as bad as everyone makes it out to be. It's better than the two albums that came after it. I wish they would just rerecord it so it's up to the same production value as the others. I believe that's why Dave hates it so much.
  • Avatar for TheFooLiSTeNeR
    Underrated.
  • Avatar for nopuppet
    "underrated" - nice joke
  • Avatar for borgy
    "''It's much better than In Your Honor and Echoes... '' Profanity!!" Actually, truth. In Your Honor disc 1 is M.O.R. Rock music (Disc 2 however is fantastic.) and Echoes is a mix of bland ballads and M.O.R. Rock. I think the only reason the band holds this album in such low regard is because of tensions and problems the band was having during it's creation. 'Wasting Light' returned them to greatness.
  • Avatar for reagan0
    I think this is my favorite FF album. Hmmm.... Maybe.
  • Avatar for Oriol1992
    This album is neither good or bad, it's stuck somewhere in between these two adjectives...
  • Avatar for BHolladay
    The first four tracks on this album could also easily be the first four tracks on a Foo Fighters greatest hits album.
  • Avatar for Oriol1992
    ''It's much better than In Your Honor and Echoes... '' Profanity!!
  • Avatar for thomplee
    Best album!!!!
  • Avatar for paynexkiller
    Release date 4 Oct 2005 - What?

API Calls