Thumbnail of Crystal Castles Crystal Castles

Not in Love (3:33)

Cover of Crystal Castles ( II )

From Crystal Castles ( II ) and 5 other releases

Tags

Everyone’s tags

More tags

Preview this track (0:30)

Play
Position: 00:00
Flag video
About this video
More about this track…

Albums featuring this track (6)

Similar Tracks

  Track   Duration Listeners
  Crystal Castles - Intimate 4:45 186,152
  Crystal Castles - Birds 2:30 187,237
  Metronomy - The Bay 4:50 161,664
The Knife - Heartbeats 3:52 488,028
The Knife - Pass This On 3:48 336,252
Klaxons - Golden Skans 2:45 630,626

Listening Trend

297,463listeners all time
1,982,909scrobbles all time
Recent listeners trend:

Explore more

Listen to, buy or share

Buy

Buy on Amazon MP3 - $1.29 Amazon MP3 Expand purchase options
  • 1,982,909
    scrobbles
  • 297,463
    listeners

Send ‘Not in Love’ Ringtone to Cell

i saw your picture hangin' on the back of my door
won't give you my heart
no one lives there anymore
and we were lovers

MetroLyrics Full lyrics at MetroLyrics

Shoutbox

Leave a comment. Log in to Last.fm or sign up.

  • oisouotario

    this one is better than the robert one bye [2]

    1 Jun 1:09am Reply

  • mirinthesky

    This song has its own charm.

    30 May 8:06pm Reply

  • Malkamillian

    pleasant enough.

    9 May 9:58am Reply

  • hayzozo

    there is seriously like no crystal castles page that externalexodus is not being a huge douche all over. anyways fuck the robert smith version, absolute trash compared to the original album version.

    2 May 8:55am Reply

  • sarapurry

    Oh wow I don't even like Crystal Castles but I'm completely addicted to this song because of Robert Smith.

    19 Apr 9:41pm Reply

  • explosive-

    this one is better than the robert one bye

    19 Apr 6:31am Reply

  • Spazmo9000

    wow, shut up, nerd ↓ anyways, the Robert Smith version is better [3]

    4 Apr 4:14pm Reply

  • brokenever

    Robert Smith version is better [5] Anything with Robert Smith automatically becomes better :)

    23 Feb 1:16pm Reply

  • volupiaken

    Robert Smith version is better [4]

    27 Jan 12:16am Reply

  • spacemonkey2977

    wow, shut up, nerd ↓ anyways, the Robert Smith version is better (2)

    11 Jan 8:35pm Reply

  • Styxia

    Wow.

    10 Jan 8:30am Reply

  • blackfloyd23

    Lots of vapid opinions thrown around about which version is better in this shoutbox. Who cares?

    10 Jan 4:24am Reply

  • my--angel

    cool <3

    10 Jan 3:40am Reply

  • namelessgrave

    Robert version sucks. Original is better.

    5 Jan 5:13pm Reply

  • Orangism

    CheezburgersLOL, you're so mature

    1 Jan 8:02pm Reply

  • CheezburgersLOL

    wow, shut up, nerd ↓ anyways, the Robert Smith version is better

    30 Dec 2012 Reply

  • EternalExodus

    the original is better, from a progressive standpoint: while I worship the cure, the smith version placed the climactic final post-chorus at the end of each chorus section, diminishing its ultimate emotional impact, while ultimately pandering to a pop-oriented audience. ethan's disaffected, ghastly vocals, pitch-bent and recorded without emotion, pay the perfect tribute to an overly-pedantic 80s new wave track portrayed in a postmodern light; the gradual progressive build to the final chorus is nothing short of haunting, dramatic emotional decimation. in many ways, the original version feels like a precursor to many tracks on (III): the band's shift towards a much more minimal, affected vibe is present within the original track, as well as the removal of many layers of sound in favor of a more straightforward--yet distinctive--sonic profile. either way, the original version remains as the band's best song, beating out many competitors on (III).

    20 Nov 2012 Reply

  • Gerry_Digger

    i love robert's version better :)

    15 Nov 2012 Reply

  • Hozkins

    i'm in love

    10 Nov 2012 Reply

  • Nicochurm

    ↓

    8 Nov 2012 Reply
    • All 345 shouts

Listening Now

Top Listeners