The Antichristian Phenomenon

Active Discussions

growling_one commented on “doom is upon us...” (14)   3 hours ago

Methis commented on “Thought experiment” (28)   4 hours ago

Waldheri commented on “Atheism?” (16)   9 days ago

prdssn commented on “Happy Yuletid!” (2)   11 days ago

Apollyon_ commented on “Reason and intuition” (9)   13 days ago

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  4 hours ago

  it wasn't about you, it's a general remark. I never miss the sarcasm bus!

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• jorrizza wrote:
  4 hours ago

  Someone missed the sarcasm bus and is being hit by the *whoosh* train. No offense :)

  View Profile | Leave jorrizza a shout

• LeaTelamon wrote:
  6 hours ago

  The thing is that our group name doesn't necessarily try to be smart or anything, it's just a rip off of a Behemoth song :P

  View Profile | Leave LeaTelamon a shout

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  8 hours ago

  It's just that every time someone spams about a group or band here, there is some sort of analysis on how bad or mediocre or incorrectly named it is, it's getting a bit snobbish imo. RIP Promethea?

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  8 hours ago

  "Smurf". Here you go!

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• RageofAnath wrote:
  17 hours ago

  Yes it is! It's so ambiguous that it can mean anything to anyone!

  View Profile | Leave RageofAnath a shout

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  18 hours ago

  Oh, stop complaining people. The antichristian phenomenon is hardly an incredibly insightful descriptive group name that puts all others to shame.

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• LeaTelamon wrote:
  yesterday evening

  *hands jorrizza a pancake*

  View Profile | Leave LeaTelamon a shout

• jorrizza wrote:
  yesterday evening

  Trust to do what? It's a pretty empty statement. I also agree with the statement "In god we trust". You can always count on the fact some people come up with some kind of deity and actually start believing in it. The group description is even worse, "believe in science". Oh come on. I believe in accountancy as well. And it's only for humans. Expats from the planet Thrimop-7, like me, can't even join. That's just specieist.

  View Profile | Leave jorrizza a shout

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  yesterday evening

  YES

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• RadioactiveFern wrote:
  yesterday evening

  join if u agree with: http://www.last.fm/group/In+Science+We+Trust

  View Profile | Leave RadioactiveFern a shout

• LeaTelamon wrote:
  yesterday evening

  Boring band honestly. Nothing special or mind-catching about that at least. Every song sounded pretty much the same, some tempo-shifts and whatnot would've been nice.

  View Profile | Leave LeaTelamon a shout

• jorrizza wrote:
  yesterday evening

  http://bigpicture.ru/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/2020.jpg I don't know, but isn't that "The artist formerly known as the artist formerly known as Prince"? If that's true, a lot of the self-mutilation suddenly makes sense.

  View Profile | Leave jorrizza a shout

• blackadder77 wrote:
  yesterday evening

  What happened in photo 33 and why? Very disturbing.

  View Profile | Leave blackadder77 a shout

• Waldheri wrote:
  yesterday afternoon

  Oh certainly. :-) I'm not denying that. I just took the opportunity to infuse some epistemology.

  View Profile | Leave Waldheri a shout

• VampyreAngel wrote:
  yesterday morning

  Nonetheless, his was a good guess!

  View Profile | Leave VampyreAngel a shout

• Waldheri wrote:
  yesterday morning

  It is that you can't be certain that a particular observation will be repeated - you've seen us say "No." to spam whores but that doesn't give you certainty that we will repeat that. The classical example is with swans: it was thought that all swans were white, because every swan people had seen were white. Turns out, there are also black swans. Using induction, they'd come to the wrong conclusion that all swans were white.

  View Profile | Leave Waldheri a shout

• firefox737 wrote:
  Sunday evening

  No, but I am only 13. I imagine it has something to do with the opening of something, i.e a combination of 'No.'s?

  View Profile | Leave firefox737 a shout

• Waldheri wrote:
  Sunday afternoon

  No you don't, have you never heard of the problem of induction?!

  View Profile | Leave Waldheri a shout

• firefox737 wrote:
  Sunday afternoon

  I can see where this is going to go...

  View Profile | Leave firefox737 a shout