ListenShare - Generates chart based on your share of artist's scrobbles

- darkshadow88 said...
- User
- 25 Mar 2009, 04:08
ListenShare - Generates chart based on your share of artist's scrobbles

I have just completed a new tool called ListenShare that will sort your chart based on how many scrobbles you have for an artist relative to that artist's total scrobbles. In order to be able to actually have values for very popular artists, the ratio is scaled to 1 million, where 1 million means all of an artist's scrobbles are yours and 0 means that less than one in a million are.

You can get it here: http://www.quinnsoft.com/random/listenshare.php

I will be releasing the source as soon as I clean up the commented-out code and unused classes.

Please let me know if there are any problems or if you have any suggestions for improving the program. (I do plan on adding the option to cache artist playcounts in a future version)

[quote][b][user]darkshadow88[/user][/b] said: I have just completed a new tool called ListenShare that will sort your chart based on how many scrobbles you have for an artist relative to that artist's total scrobbles. In order to be able to actually have values for very popular artists, the ratio is scaled to 1 million, where 1 million means all of an artist's scrobbles are yours and 0 means that less than one in a million are. You can get it here: [url=http://www.quinnsoft.com/random/listenshare.php]http://www.quinnsoft.com/random/listenshare.php[/url] I will be releasing the source as soon as I clean up the commented-out code and unused classes. Please let me know if there are any problems or if you have any suggestions for improving the program. (I do plan on adding the option to cache artist playcounts in a future version)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- salagadam said...
- User
- 25 Mar 2009, 12:15
a really great tool. thanks. but it was boring to wait loading all library. maybe you can add an option to select top 50 or 100 artists. (:

[quote][b][user]salagadam[/user][/b] said: a really great tool. thanks. but it was boring to wait loading all library. maybe you can add an option to select top 50 or 100 artists. (:[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- yaksztarr said...
- User
- 26 Mar 2009, 03:13
Nice tool, indeed.

But the window is not changeable in size, so it takes time to scroll down.
A change of that would be cool.

And a search function would be great, because searching by your own is just boring.^^

Cache artist playcounts is a good idea.

[quote][b][user]yaksztarr[/user][/b] said: Nice tool, indeed. But the window is not changeable in size, so it takes time to scroll down. A change of that would be cool. And a search function would be great, because searching by your own is just boring.^^ Cache artist playcounts is a good idea. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- darkshadow88 said...
- User
- 31 Mar 2009, 08:36
I have implemented the option to only consider top n artists and the ability to make the window resizable. The new version (0.52) is up for download now.

I have also licensed it under GPL v3 and provided a download of the source code.

[quote][b][user]darkshadow88[/user][/b] said: I have implemented the option to only consider top n artists and the ability to make the window resizable. The new version (0.52) is up for download now. I have also licensed it under GPL v3 and provided a download of the source code.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- C26000 said...
- User
- 2 Apr 2009, 21:01
nice tool :) , I just added it to the overview text I haven't seen it earlier.

[quote][b][user]C26000[/user][/b] said: nice tool :) , I just added it to the overview text I haven't seen it earlier. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- WinterWanderer said...
- User
- 4 Apr 2009, 23:02
I like it. My number 1 is Cathis ord with a value of 108527!

Not bad if I say so myself...

but this is VERY dependant on the popularity of the artist. For some, anything over 50 would be impressive while for others 100 000 is nothing.

[quote][b][user]WinterWanderer[/user][/b] said: I like it. My number 1 is Cathis ord with a value of 108527! Not bad if I say so myself... but this is VERY dependant on the popularity of the artist. For some, anything over 50 would be impressive while for others 100 000 is nothing.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Egg21 said...
- User
- 11 Apr 2009, 20:07
Post your number one!

My number one is Francesco Scarpa with a value of 928,571.
(And number two is Claus Ankersen with a value of 882,352.)

Post your number one!

It is a very nice tool for finding wrong tags that Last.fm hasn't been able to correct. I had a few "artists" with 1,000,000. Would never have found them otherwise. Thanks.

Suggestions:
Make it possible to copy the text from the program.
Can the artist names become clickable links?

[quote][b][user]Egg21[/user][/b] said: My number one is [artist]Francesco Scarpa[/artist] with a value of 928,571. (And number two is [artist]Claus Ankersen[/artist] with a value of 882,352.) Post your number one! It is a very nice tool for finding wrong tags that Last.fm hasn't been able to correct. I had a few "artists" with 1,000,000. Would never have found them otherwise. Thanks. Suggestions: Make it possible to copy the text from the program. Can the artist names become clickable links?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Egg21 said...
- User
- 11 Apr 2009, 20:10
....and my number 6 is Un1son with a value of 666,666 !!

[quote][b][user]Egg21[/user][/b] said: ....and my number 6 is [artist]Un1son[/artist] with a value of 666,666 !![/quote]

Permalink Quote
- penguin_of_zoom said...
- User
- 12 Apr 2009, 14:00
Very cool. :)

[quote][b][user]penguin_of_zoom[/user][/b] said: Very cool. :)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- rickskin said...
- Subscriber
- 4 May 2009, 11:15
I like this. Interesting. Thanks!

[quote][b][user]rickskin[/user][/b] said: I like this. Interesting. Thanks![/quote]

Permalink Quote