Musical Taste is subjective.

Join Share

Leaders: None! (Want to run for leader? See our groups help section for what you can do.)
Join Policy: Open
Created on: 1 Dec 2008
Description:

sub⋅jec⋅tive [suhb-jek-tiv]: influenced by personal opinion.

Just because you don't like my taste in music, doesn't mean it's bad. It's just different.

> sub⋅jec⋅tive [suhb-jek-tiv]: influenced by personal opinion.

Just because you don't like my taste in music, doesn't mean it's bad. It's just different. Stop telling me my music is terrible. Stop telling me this band is terrible. Your definition of terrible is different from mine. There are no defined terms in music, as it is an art.

Just because you don't like how that artist painted that picture, it doesn't mean it's horrible, and should be burned. Likewise, stay out of my headphones. What I listen to is my personal choice. Thank you.

Recent Journals

A Day on TT.FM with Neesh by neesh | 9 Nov 2011
The interface of musical taste by Randwer | 30 Sep 2011
Essential progressive metal albums by Neue_regel_ | 22 Aug 2011 | 2 comments

See all

Weekly Top Artists

Overall Unique to this Group

1	Florence + the Machine	38
2	Radiohead	34
3	Rihanna	32
4	Britney Spears	32
5	Linkin Park	30
6	Coldplay	28
7	Lady Gaga	25
8	The Beatles	25
9	Gotye	24
10	Beyoncé	23

Shoutbox

Leave a comment. Log in to Last.fm or sign up (it’s free).

Subjetividad

What is quality? technique? The music is felt and enjoyed, not fit parameters and technique.Reducirlo a eso mata el arte. Completely agree whit Jewrusalem, I add: life is a subjective experience itself. Sorry for the English translation of Google traductor.

25 days ago
Mallkorr

Fags. Taste is not subjective as long as quality isn't. Considering there's bad and good music, the ones who listen to good music have an objectively better taste, simple as that

last month
purplehazethc

Taste is subjective, quality is not [6].

last month
Jewrusalem

Quality is not objective. There is no grand governing body who dictates which vibrations are more pleasing to the human ear in general. If you think quality is objective in the arts then you have some growing up to do. Reception to the arts is entirely subjective.

January 2012
dany_eimori

Taste is subjective; quality is also subjective. [2]

December 2011
Randwer

Taste is subjective; quality is not. [6] figures this group would have shit charts [2]

September 2011
LordsOfTheStorm

Taste is subjective; quality is not. [5]

August 2011
Sworn-

Taste is subjective; quality is not. [4]

August 2011
CaseyDeAnn

For the enlightened ones who stumble across this page: Music is Objective :)

August 2011
Trash73

Join Proud NOT to be a True Metalhead

July 2011
Ilmakko

Aerosmithfan`s comment made me laugh... Why can`t we just admit that he is trolling (if you can`t see it clearly), but nice point of view by the way.

June 2011
cikador

neue_regel_: So you mean there is OBJECTIVITY as to what is relevant artistic display? If your brain likes the sonar experience - the artistic display is relevant, whether it be Merzbow, Gaga or anything else.

March 2011
Neue_regel_

Of course one's taste is SUBJECTIVE but a Top-10 with artists here like Rihanna, Katy Perry, Daft Punk, Muse, Radiohead, Florence + the Machine, Lady Gaga, Paramore, Coldplay, The Beatles etc. present a shallow relevance to Music as an Artistic display and a cultural aspect.

February 2011
failbot666

@AerosmithFan112; Vacuum's aint the same as music...

January 2011
Neue_regel_

Taste is subjective; quality is also subjective.

December 2010
revealingstorm

Taste is subjective; quality is not. [3]

December 2010
KinomiyaMichiru

Change the picture. Please. [2]

November 2010
liverstix

Change the picture. Please.

November 2010
WhiteZander

it's subjective...and the charts still consist of the usual suspects...boring [2] I am afraid to join this group because of AerosmithFan112's comment. [2]

October 2010
love_conquers

Taste is subjective; quality is not. [2]

September 2010