Plugin Popularity Stats

Page 2 of 2Prev 1 2

- [Deleted user] said...
- User
- 14 Dec 2004, 19:27
Yes, but the way it is broken down, they (spammed accts) only account for that high end. I know where I stand, and the generalities between the other tiers of the breakdown would be more or less accurate, so pretty much just to give a basic idea of where everyone else stand is where my curiosity comes in.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: Yes, but the way it is broken down, they (spammed accts) only account for that high end. I know where I stand, and the generalities between the other tiers of the breakdown would be more or less accurate, so pretty much just to give a basic idea of where everyone else stand is where my curiosity comes in.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- [Deleted user] said...
- User
- 14 Dec 2004, 19:29
Also, it would probably be simple enough to just disregard anyone whose profile has over XXX,XXX songs, or some such. I'm sure there aren't THAT many who have spammed, and those that have can be discounted quite easily without too many false-positives while chopping off the top of that list.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: Also, it would probably be simple enough to just disregard anyone whose profile has over XXX,XXX songs, or some such. I'm sure there aren't THAT many who have spammed, and those that have can be discounted quite easily without too many false-positives while chopping off the top of that list.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 14 Dec 2004, 19:50
Yes, you should be able to filter out the super, high counts, but even so, the chart will be interesting to see, and to compare to the one earlier in the topic.

Music, like language, is universal.

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: Yes, you should be able to filter out the super, high counts, but even so, the chart will be interesting to see, and to compare to the one earlier in the topic.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- rpaulinich said...
- User
- 15 Dec 2004, 04:29
cuando tendremos el miniranking para nuestras canciones...?

[quote][b][user]rpaulinich[/user][/b] said: cuando tendremos el miniranking para nuestras canciones...?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- [Deleted user] said...
- User
- 15 Dec 2004, 19:57
Re:

Quoth killdXm:
Also, it would probably be simple enough to just disregard anyone whose profile has over XXX,XXX songs, or some such. I'm sure there aren't THAT many who have spammed, and those that have can be discounted quite easily without too many false-positives while chopping off the top of that list.

What counts as super high? I've got 31000 tunes to listen to on my foobar playlist. If I go away for 3 months and they all get played do I get banned? :D

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth killdXm[/b]: Also, it would probably be simple enough to just disregard anyone whose profile has over XXX,XXX songs, or some such. I'm sure there aren't THAT many who have spammed, and those that have can be discounted quite easily without too many false-positives while chopping off the top of that list.[/quote] What counts as super high? I've got 31000 tunes to listen to on my foobar playlist. If I go away for 3 months and they all get played do I get banned? :D[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- djkc said...
- User
- 16 Dec 2004, 01:45
This is kind of the definition. Between the bug in 0.0.4 of the itunes windows plugin and some server hiccups there's a rather absurd amount of incorrect plays on that account ^^

[quote][b][user]djkc[/user][/b] said: [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/jaquiloro/]This[/url] is kind of the definition. Between the bug in 0.0.4 of the itunes windows plugin and some server hiccups there's a rather absurd amount of incorrect plays on that account ^^[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- for4saken said...
- User
- 4 Jan 2005, 14:21
Re: Plugin Popularity Stats

Quoth RJ:
id | count -----+------- (...) juk | 1

where I can find the JUK plugin ?!

I would like to submit my tracks when I'm on SuSE.

Thanks,

Marcos, 'For4saken'

p.s.: I don't use xmms, also the xmms plugin doesn't work for me.

[quote][b][user]for4saken[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth RJ[/b]: [code] id | count -----+------- (...) juk | 1 [/code][/quote] where I can find the JUK plugin ?! I would like to submit my tracks when I'm on SuSE. Thanks, Marcos, 'For4saken' p.s.: I don't use xmms, also the xmms plugin doesn't work for me. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- jeffersoninnit said...
- User
- 4 Jan 2005, 17:38
Re:

Quoth djkc:
This is kind of the definition. Between the bug in 0.0.4 of the itunes windows plugin and some server hiccups there's a rather absurd amount of incorrect plays on that account ^^

Wow.

[quote][b][user]jeffersoninnit[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth djkc[/b]: [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/jaquiloro/]This[/url] is kind of the definition. Between the bug in 0.0.4 of the itunes windows plugin and some server hiccups there's a rather absurd amount of incorrect plays on that account ^^[/quote] Wow.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- ploum said...
- User
- 11 Jan 2005, 11:57
I use Beep-Media-Player but the plugin identifies itself as xmms plugin. So, I don't understand that "bmp" appears in the plugin list !

Want to be an astronaut ? - FreeMusic, as in speech - Discover the Underknown

[quote][b][user]ploum[/user][/b] said: I use Beep-Media-Player but the plugin identifies itself as xmms plugin. So, I don't understand that "bmp" appears in the plugin list ![/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Dubhghaill said...
- User
- 12 Jan 2005, 01:45
Re: Juk question

The Juk plug-in is in the the latest cvs code, so to get it you'll have to get a cvs version of KDE, an alpha or beta version of KDE 3.4 or wait till KDE 3.4 comes out, which will hopefully be in march (even then you may want to wait till your distro ships it). In the mean time i'm using Amarok.

It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees - Emiliano Zapata

[quote][b][user]Dubhghaill[/user][/b] said: The Juk plug-in is in the the latest cvs code, so to get it you'll have to get a cvs version of KDE, an alpha or beta version of KDE 3.4 or wait till KDE 3.4 comes out, which will hopefully be in march (even then you may want to wait till your distro ships it). In the mean time i'm using Amarok.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- for4saken said...
- User
- 13 Jan 2005, 18:05
thanks, Dubhghaill.

I was planning to do a Juk plugin by myself, but I'm so _lazy...

I'll wait for the release of KDE 3.4, then update my SuSE whit it, via apt-get.

[quote][b][user]for4saken[/user][/b] said: thanks, Dubhghaill. I was planning to do a Juk plugin by myself, but I'm so [sub]lazy[/sub]... I'll wait for the release of KDE 3.4, then update my SuSE whit it, via apt-get. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- x3ja said...
- User
- 26 Jan 2005, 17:15
re: JuK question

I've got the latest CVS of kdemultimedia with JuK in it, and there's no sign of the AS plugin. I'm running 3.4 Beta 1 as it is, but nothing there... am I doing something wrong?

[quote][b][user]x3ja[/user][/b] said: I've got the latest CVS of kdemultimedia with JuK in it, and there's no sign of the AS plugin. I'm running 3.4 Beta 1 as it is, but nothing there... am I doing something wrong?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- krazykiwi said...
- User
- 28 Jan 2005, 00:47
No, it's not in CVS (and will not be in 3.4)

Amarok 1.2 has audioscrobbler support built in (in both directions - it can submit and build playlists based on the similar artists data)

[quote][b][user]krazykiwi[/user][/b] said: No, it's not in CVS (and will not be in 3.4) Amarok 1.2 has audioscrobbler support built in (in both directions - it can submit and build playlists based on the similar artists data)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- rhorn said...
- User
- 28 Jan 2005, 12:13
Amarok?

Is Amarok represented as ark?

- - - A m a r o k - - -

[quote][b][user]rhorn[/user][/b] said: Is Amarok represented as ark?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- giveuptheghost said...
- User
- 28 Jan 2005, 14:13
Yep.

-Scott

[quote][b][user]giveuptheghost[/user][/b] said: Yep. -Scott[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Dubhghaill said...
- User
- 29 Jan 2005, 01:36
Sorry for4saken

sorry for giving you some bad information there for4saken, krazykiwi is right the audioscrobbler patch is not in cvs yet. You can find it at http://scrobbler.progoth.com/

It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees - Emiliano Zapata

[quote][b][user]Dubhghaill[/user][/b] said: sorry for giving you some bad information there for4saken, krazykiwi is right the audioscrobbler patch is not in cvs yet. You can find it at http://scrobbler.progoth.com/[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- CheersDarlin said...
- User
- 20 Mar 2005, 00:31
Is there gonna be one for Windows Media Player 10 anytime soon?

Sorry, brand new to the site so a bit dim about the workings of it... *goes red*

[quote][b][user]CheersDarlin[/user][/b] said: Is there gonna be one for Windows Media Player 10 anytime soon? Sorry, brand new to the site so a bit dim about the workings of it... *goes red*[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- ploum said...
- User
- 20 Mar 2005, 11:44
CheersDarlin, use a media player. Despite the name, this "thing" is all but a media player.

Want to be an astronaut ? - FreeMusic, as in speech - Discover the Underknown

[quote][b][user]ploum[/user][/b] said: CheersDarlin, use a media player. Despite the name, this "thing" is all but a media player.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- hilja said...
- User
- 20 Mar 2005, 19:18
h

[quote][b][user]hilja[/user][/b] said: h[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- [Deleted user] said...
- User
- 18 Apr 2005, 16:30
I have no clue what the topic is about I don't even know how I got here.
--The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles?
-- this is it,right?What's such a big deal abt the profiles.mkay....I'd better like...whatever.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: I have no clue what the topic is about I don't even know how I got here. --The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles? -- this is it,right?What's such a big deal abt the profiles.mkay....I'd better like...whatever. [/quote]

Permalink Quote