Plugin Popularity Stats

Page 1 of 21 2 Next

- RJ said...
- Staff
- 31 Jul 2004, 13:24
Plugin Popularity Stats

id | count -----+------- wa2 | 12043 wmp | 2664 osx | 1771 itw | 1769 foo | 1334 xms | 449 qcd | 199 slm | 24 bmp | 19 ami | 15 tst | 4 mdn | 2 juk | 1

Information wants to be beer.

[quote][b][user]RJ[/user][/b] said: [code] id | count -----+------- wa2 | 12043 wmp | 2664 osx | 1771 itw | 1769 foo | 1334 xms | 449 qcd | 199 slm | 24 bmp | 19 ami | 15 tst | 4 mdn | 2 juk | 1 [/code][/quote]

Permalink Quote
- giveuptheghost said...
- User
- 31 Jul 2004, 14:42
Compared to Media Player Groups memberships:

grp | count ----+------ foo | 310 wa2 | 207 osx | 148 itw | 90 xms | 77 wmp | 32 qcd | 29 slm | 6 bmp | 2 ami | -

-Scott

[quote][b][user]giveuptheghost[/user][/b] said: Compared to [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/groups/?cat=8]Media Player Groups[/url] memberships: [code]grp | count ----+------ [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/Foobar%2BUsers]foo[/url] | 310 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/Winamp]wa2[/url] | 207 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/iTunes%2BiScrobblers]osx[/url] | 148 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/iTunes%2Bfor%2BWindows]itw[/url] | 90 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/XMMS%2BUsers]xms[/url] | 77 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/Windows%2BMedia%2BPlayer]wmp[/url] | 32 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/QCD]qcd[/url] | 29 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/SlimScrobbler]slm[/url] | 6 [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/group/Beep%2BMedia%2BPlayer]bmp[/url] | 2 ami | -[/code] -Scott[/quote]
Edited by giveuptheghost on 31 Jul 2004, 14:59

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 1 Aug 2004, 06:36
Might I suggest that this data is used to re-order the plugins page, since currently there's an Amiga plugin at the top!

Rod.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: Might I suggest that this data is used to re-order the plugins page, since currently there's an Amiga plugin at the top! Rod.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- ericg said...
- Subscriber
- 1 Aug 2004, 19:07
Re:

Quoth rODbegbie:
Might I suggest that this data is used to re-order the plugins page, since currently there's an Amiga plugin at the top!

Fantastic suggestion!

[quote][b][user]ericg[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth rODbegbie[/b]: Might I suggest that this data is used to re-order the plugins page, since currently there's an Amiga plugin at the top! [/quote] Fantastic suggestion! [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- JazzSheep said...
- User
- 1 Aug 2004, 20:21
foobar rules

Shoop

[quote][b][user]JazzSheep[/user][/b] said: foobar rules[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 1 Aug 2004, 23:13
If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.

_{iScrobbler/Mac Support Group}

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 1 Aug 2004, 23:27
Re:

Quoth DoctorT:
If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.

Telekenesis. They psychically change the bits on the hard drive platters of the database server, using only the power of their minds.

Rod.

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth DoctorT[/b]: If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.[/quote] Telekenesis. They psychically change the bits on the hard drive platters of the database server, using only the power of their minds. Rod.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 1 Aug 2004, 23:37
Re: Re:

Quoth rODbegbie:
Telekenesis. They psychically change the bits on the hard drive platters of the database server, using only the power of their minds.

Rod.

Ah, maybe that explains the recent crashes. Some people either don't know the strength of their powers or they are not very well trained and they send the wrong signals.

;-)>

_{iScrobbler/Mac Support Group}

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth rODbegbie[/b]: Telekenesis. They psychically change the bits on the hard drive platters of the database server, using only the power of their minds. Rod.[/quote] Ah, maybe that explains the recent crashes. Some people either don't know the strength of their powers or they are not very well trained and they send the wrong signals. ;-)>[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 3 Aug 2004, 09:18
The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles?

_{iScrobbler/Mac Support Group}

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 4 Aug 2004, 17:32
Re:

Quoth DoctorT:
The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles?

how about a percent breakdown on how many people have more than x ammount of songs

like for example

001-0010 -1%
011-0100 -30%
101-0500 -50%
501-1000 -10%
1001+ ----9%

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth DoctorT[/b]: The Wired article stated that many people have built up sizable profiles. Just out of curiosity (and realizing it's not a contest, and also realizing this is constantly changing), could a similar chart be taken of the ranges of sizes of profiles?[/quote] how about a percent breakdown on how many people have more than x ammount of songs like for example 001-0010 -1% 011-0100 -30% 101-0500 -50% 501-1000 -10% 1001+ ----9%[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Russ said...
- Staff
- 6 Aug 2004, 12:24
This is number of profiles, and hence will be skewed. Apologies for the uneven intervals. Size is the number of songs listened in last.fm and audioscrobbler.
Size | Amount 0 | 143828 1-49 | 22629 50-99 | 3704 100-499 | 9680 500-999 | 4335 1000-2999 | 6388 3000-4999 | 2041 5000-6999 | 878 7000-9999 | 565 10000-49999 | 442 Largest profile size is 40836

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: This is number of profiles, and hence will be skewed. Apologies for the uneven intervals. Size is the number of songs listened in last.fm and audioscrobbler. [code] Size | Amount 0 | 143828 1-49 | 22629 50-99 | 3704 100-499 | 9680 500-999 | 4335 1000-2999 | 6388 3000-4999 | 2041 5000-6999 | 878 7000-9999 | 565 10000-49999 | 442 Largest profile size is 40836 [/code][/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 6 Aug 2004, 13:28
Thanx, Russ. The numbers do give an indication where users are. How many of the zero to 49 accounts are abandoned, I wonder? I will interesting to see a comparison in 4 - 6 months time.

_{iScrobbler/Mac Support Group}

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: Thanx, Russ. The numbers do give an indication where users are. How many of the zero to 49 accounts are abandoned, I wonder? I will interesting to see a comparison in 4 - 6 months time.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- missingno said...
- User
- 10 Aug 2004, 04:37
Re:

Quoth DoctorT:
If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.

I signed up before that i realized that MusicMatch wasn't compatible.

[quote][b][user]missingno[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth DoctorT[/b]: If you are about to/have hit 100,000 accounts, and the plug-in stats add up to ~20,000, what do the remaining 80,000 people do? Just curious.[/quote] I signed up before that i realized that MusicMatch wasn't compatible.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- xurble said...
- User
- 13 Oct 2004, 20:33
I've only just found this but.

Any chance of drawing that plugin popularity chart as a graph on the statistics page on a regular basis?

I didn't do it.

[quote][b][user]xurble[/user][/b] said: I've only just found this but. Any chance of drawing that plugin popularity chart as a graph on the statistics page on a regular basis?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Reaper6699 said...
- User
- 17 Oct 2004, 13:52
Re:

Quoth Russ:
This is number of profiles, and hence will be skewed. Apologies for the uneven intervals. Size is the number of songs listened in last.fm and audioscrobbler.
Size | Amount 0 | 143828 1-49 | 22629 50-99 | 3704 100-499 | 9680 500-999 | 4335 1000-2999 | 6388 3000-4999 | 2041 5000-6999 | 878 7000-9999 | 565 10000-49999 | 442 Largest profile size is 40836

I'm assuming this is the song count, correct? I know there were other things discussed in this thread, so I don't know if they're linked.

[quote][b][user]Reaper6699[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth Russ[/b]: This is number of profiles, and hence will be skewed. Apologies for the uneven intervals. Size is the number of songs listened in last.fm and audioscrobbler. [code] Size | Amount 0 | 143828 1-49 | 22629 50-99 | 3704 100-499 | 9680 500-999 | 4335 1000-2999 | 6388 3000-4999 | 2041 5000-6999 | 878 7000-9999 | 565 10000-49999 | 442 Largest profile size is 40836 [/code][/quote] I'm assuming this is the song count, correct? I know there were other things discussed in this thread, so I don't know if they're linked. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- giveuptheghost said...
- User
- 17 Oct 2004, 18:09
Size is the song count per profile, yeah, and Amount the number of users with that many songs in their profiles.

-Scott

[quote][b][user]giveuptheghost[/user][/b] said: Size is the song count per profile, yeah, and Amount the number of users with that many songs in their profiles. -Scott[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Reaper6699 said...
- User
- 18 Oct 2004, 01:31
Then what about joffeman? He has like 78000 songs.

[quote][b][user]Reaper6699[/user][/b] said: Then what about joffeman? He has like 78000 songs.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- djkc said...
- User
- 18 Oct 2004, 04:30
Look at the date on the post, you'll note that the stats posted there are from several months ago... There are several with more than that max number now I believe.

For example they're at ~250k now although obviously that's a special case...

[quote][b][user]djkc[/user][/b] said: Look at the date on the post, you'll note that the stats posted there are from several months ago... There are several with more than that max number now I believe. [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/holdmusic/]For example[/url] they're at ~250k now although obviously that's a special case...[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Reaper6699 said...
- User
- 18 Oct 2004, 05:15
Re:

Quoth djkc:
Look at the date on the post, you'll note that the stats posted there are from several months ago... There are several with more than that max number now I believe.

For example they're at ~250k now although obviously that's a special case...

You mean 25K. ;)

[quote][b][user]Reaper6699[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth djkc[/b]: Look at the date on the post, you'll note that the stats posted there are from several months ago... There are several with more than that max number now I believe. [url=http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/holdmusic/]For example[/url] they're at ~250k now although obviously that's a special case...[/quote] You mean 25K. ;)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- djkc said...
- User
- 18 Oct 2004, 06:33
No, I actually meant 250k. It's wrong but I originally looked at it wrong as well and that is what I meant at the time. Would be silly to just let some facts get in the way of making a point.

[quote][b][user]djkc[/user][/b] said: No, I actually meant 250k. It's wrong but I originally looked at it wrong as well and that is what I meant at the time. Would be silly to just let some facts get in the way of making a point.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Reaper6699 said...
- User
- 18 Oct 2004, 07:06
HAHAHA, yes. So is someone going to update these numbers, so we see where the stats are right now?

[quote][b][user]Reaper6699[/user][/b] said: HAHAHA, yes. So is someone going to update these numbers, so we see where the stats are right now?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- muesli said...
- Subscriber
- 14 Dec 2004, 01:20
i'd like to see updated stats! :-)

http://blog.chris.de

[quote][b][user]muesli[/user][/b] said: i'd like to see updated stats! :-)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Russ said...
- Staff
- 14 Dec 2004, 16:48
OK as you might have noticed we changed how we record these stats on Friday when we moved to Java - we now store plugin id and version in seperate columns as opposed to combined like before. So I reset everyone who had the old values, so these are purely stats from Friday:

last=# select lastscrobplugin, count(*) from users group by lastscrobplugin order by count(*) desc; lastscrobplugin | count -----------------+-------- wa2 | 17667 itw | 5518 wmp | 2920 osx | 1846 foo | 1823 xms | 591 ark | 533 qcd | 205 jmc | 74 rbx | 39 slm | 27 tst | 9 shk | 4 mdn | 3 bmp | 3 mpd | 2 noa | 2 pte | 1 123 | 1

179433 registered users have never used a Scrobbler plugin, and 31387 users haven't submitted since last Friday.

I'll make a proper graph of these at some point, it's easy enough now.

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: OK as you might have noticed we changed how we record these stats on Friday when we moved to Java - we now store plugin id and version in seperate columns as opposed to combined like before. So I reset everyone who had the old values, so these are purely stats from Friday: [code] last=# select lastscrobplugin, count(*) from users group by lastscrobplugin order by count(*) desc; lastscrobplugin | count -----------------+-------- wa2 | 17667 itw | 5518 wmp | 2920 osx | 1846 foo | 1823 xms | 591 ark | 533 qcd | 205 jmc | 74 rbx | 39 slm | 27 tst | 9 shk | 4 mdn | 3 bmp | 3 mpd | 2 noa | 2 pte | 1 123 | 1 [/code] 179433 registered users have never used a Scrobbler plugin, and 31387 users haven't submitted since last Friday. I'll make a proper graph of these at some point, it's easy enough now.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 14 Dec 2004, 17:17
That's awesome, thanks Russ... think we can get one breaking down the mass of profiles by the # of songs played, again? :}

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: That's awesome, thanks Russ... think we can get one breaking down the mass of profiles by the # of songs played, again? :}[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- DoctorT said...
- User
- 14 Dec 2004, 19:12
Re:

Quoth killdXm:
That's awesome, thanks Russ... think we can get one breaking down the mass of profiles by the # of songs played, again? :}

I can see this updated chart being top-heavy with the profiles stuffed with spam or bug submissions.

_{iScrobbler/Mac Support Group}

[quote][b][user]DoctorT[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth killdXm[/b]: That's awesome, thanks Russ... think we can get one breaking down the mass of profiles by the # of songs played, again? :}[/quote] I can see this updated chart being top-heavy with the profiles stuffed with spam or bug submissions.[/quote]

Permalink Quote