We're back

Page 1 of 21 2 Next

- Russ said...
- Subscriber
- 23 Aug 2004, 15:54
We're back

Pretty much everything that could go wrong, did go wrong this weekend, but finally we are back online and we have managed to finish all the database work.

Any user who used to have multiple profiles should now find their profiles merged into one. We may have lost some stats in the process, but when we found out at 1am this morning we didn't really want to go through the whole 8-hour process again. Any stats loss should be minor. The merging of stats should, however, speed up the site a lot.

Submissions should be back online sometime this evening.

Oh, and by the way, there have been a couple of minor group updates ;).

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: Pretty much everything that could go wrong, did go wrong this weekend, but finally we are back online and we have managed to finish all the database work. Any user who used to have multiple profiles should now find their profiles merged into one. We may have lost some stats in the process, but when we found out at 1am this morning we didn't really want to go through the whole 8-hour process again. Any stats loss should be minor. The merging of stats should, however, speed up the site a lot. Submissions should be back online sometime this evening. Oh, and by the way, there have been a couple of minor group updates ;).[/quote]
Edited by Russ on 23 Aug 2004, 15:57

Permalink Quote
- RJ said...
- Staff
- 23 Aug 2004, 15:58
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.
Submissions will be back up later today.

As for the group updates, nothing too drastic yet - but a step in the right direction.

PS: Submissions will be back up later today.

Information wants to be beer.

[quote][b][user]RJ[/user][/b] said: Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. Submissions will be back up later today. As for the group updates, nothing too drastic yet - but a step in the right direction. PS: Submissions will be back up later today. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- duffman3400 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 16:00
Re: We're back

Quoth Russ:

We may have lost some stats in the process,... Any stats loss should be minor.
dude i lost all of my stats : /

[quote][b][user]duffman3400[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth Russ[/b]: We may have lost some stats in the process,... Any stats loss should be minor.[/quote] dude i lost all of my stats : /[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- lozzd said...
- Staff
- 23 Aug 2004, 16:14
Re: Re: We're back

Quoth duffman3400:
Quoth Russ:

We may have lost some stats in the process,... Any stats loss should be minor.
dude i lost all of my stats : /

lol so you did. thats kinda sucky. *checks mine*

[edit]
unless they havent finished updating yet, i've lost quite a few days worth. ah well hopefully the whole site will work lovely now.
[/edit]

[edit2]
so when are the submissions back up?

haha. sorry. had to be the first idiot to say it.

out of interest, what went wrong? perhsps might be more suited for the development forum.
[/edit2]

Want a fully customisable sig (like above?) CLICK HERE!
Insert disclaimer here.

[quote][b][user]lozzd[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth duffman3400[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth Russ[/b]: We may have lost some stats in the process,... Any stats loss should be minor.[/quote] dude i lost all of my stats : /[/quote] lol so you did. thats kinda sucky. *checks mine* [edit] unless they havent finished updating yet, i've lost quite a few days worth. ah well hopefully the whole site will work lovely now. [/edit] [edit2] so when are the submissions back up? haha. sorry. had to be the first idiot to say it. out of interest, what went wrong? perhsps might be more suited for the development forum. [/edit2][/quote]
Edited by lozzd on 23 Aug 2004, 16:18

Permalink Quote
- RJ said...
- Staff
- 23 Aug 2004, 16:53
Missing stats

i've lost the last 7 days. in few cases people may have lost more.. sorry if you have.
Newer users might be more at risk as our profile system was a little b0rked. It's fixed now tho..

Information wants to be beer.

[quote][b][user]RJ[/user][/b] said: i've lost the last 7 days. in few cases people may have lost more.. sorry if you have. Newer users might be more at risk as our profile system was a little b0rked. It's fixed now tho.. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:06
My stats are completely wrong - I have never lsitened to any queen or lacrimosa on my machine - where have my 1254 songs gone? :(

It says I have 1254 songs still but it shows three songs by queen and lacrimosa - the 2nd band I have never even heard of!! :s

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: My stats are completely wrong - I have never lsitened to any queen or lacrimosa on my machine - where have my 1254 songs gone? :( It says I have 1254 songs still but it shows three songs by queen and lacrimosa - the 2nd band I have never even heard of!! :s[/quote]
Edited by a deleted user on 23 Aug 2004, 17:09

Permalink Quote
- pookie69 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:22
MY STATS ARE READING ALL WRONG!!!!!

There are artists and songs listed that i have NEVER played/listened to!!!!

HELP!!!!!!

| Student @University College London! (UCL) | Scrobbler-married to the very cool Carolaah!

[quote][b][user]pookie69[/user][/b] said: MY STATS ARE READING ALL WRONG!!!!! There are artists and songs listed that i have NEVER played/listened to!!!! HELP!!!!!![/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Namron said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:26
OMG>????

I also lost al my stats. :'(, And I also have artist in list I never played. AAHHHH!. What's happening

Join True Listener, if you really listen to what you are playing.

[quote][b][user]Namron[/user][/b] said: I also lost al my stats. :'(, And I also have artist in list I never played. AAHHHH!. What's happening[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- kieran_87 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:31
good stuff, shame i've only been here two days and lost all of my tracks, but that obviously can't be helped! overall good to see this place online again

[quote][b][user]kieran_87[/user][/b] said: good stuff, shame i've only been here two days and lost all of my tracks, but that obviously can't be helped! overall good to see this place online again[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Trilogy said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:33
Yay, new style of top fans is quite cool.
I lost about 100-200 tracks. Not so big deal though.

[quote][b][user]Trilogy[/user][/b] said: Yay, new style of top fans is quite cool. I lost about 100-200 tracks. Not so big deal though. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- jpers36 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:35
Any explanation anywhere on the new two number thing for the track listening stats?

[quote][b][user]jpers36[/user][/b] said: Any explanation anywhere on the new two number thing for the track listening stats?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- psychodad84 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:38
Luckily, I have been to a music festival the past days. So I didn't really notice anything.

Only a couple small things have changed in my stats, so no problems in fact

[quote][b][user]psychodad84[/user][/b] said: Luckily, I have been to a music festival the past days. So I didn't really notice anything. Only a couple small things have changed in my stats, so no problems in fact[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- jpers36 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:44
OK -- I think I get it now. The user's ranking for the bands are now listed and used to sort the top fans.

[quote][b][user]jpers36[/user][/b] said: OK -- I think I get it now. The user's ranking for the bands are now listed and used to sort the top fans.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:46
How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- uvdude said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:55
Re:

Quoth skunk_monk:
How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**
yeah

the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to.

get it?

[quote][b][user]uvdude[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth skunk_monk[/b]: How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**[/quote] yeah the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to. get it?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- uvdude said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 17:56
Re: Re:

Quoth uvdude:
yeah

i mean - no :)

[quote][b][user]uvdude[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth uvdude[/b]: yeah [/quote] i mean - no :)[/quote]
Edited by uvdude on 23 Aug 2004, 17:59

Permalink Quote
- Niquaidus said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:01
My stats are quite a bit off as well. I've listened to David Bowie, but certainly not 116 times since I've been 'scrobbing. A few other artists are showing higher numbers than they should as well. I like them all, just haven't been listening to that much of them lately. Oh, and I lost just under 1,000 songs in my song count. But I don't mind that as much as the incorrect artist counts.

Also, if I'm understanding the 'Top Fans' section correctly, it's showing "ranking/#of times listened to" for a particular fan. I'm not sure I like this but I may just be resistant to change. What's the reasoning behind it?

Dip cones will drip no matter how they are made.

[quote][b][user]Niquaidus[/user][/b] said: My stats are quite a bit off as well. I've listened to David Bowie, but certainly not 116 times since I've been 'scrobbing. A few other artists are showing higher numbers than they should as well. I like them all, just haven't been listening to that much of them lately. Oh, and I lost just under 1,000 songs in my song count. But I don't mind that as much as the incorrect artist counts. Also, if I'm understanding the 'Top Fans' section correctly, it's showing "ranking/#of times listened to" for a particular fan. I'm not sure I like this but I may just be resistant to change. What's the reasoning behind it?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- ithildin said...
- Subscriber
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:05
Well...I'm pretty new so I didn't lose too much. The number of songs seems the same, though...only the top artists now shows random stuff I've never heard before.

[quote][b][user]ithildin[/user][/b] said: Well...I'm pretty new so I didn't lose too much. The number of songs seems the same, though...only the top artists now shows random stuff I've never heard before. [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- psychodad84 said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:11
Great new system for the top fans !!
Nice anticipation for the futur...

[quote][b][user]psychodad84[/user][/b] said: Great new system for the top fans !! Nice anticipation for the futur...[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- ATLien said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:18
I don't actually understand the new Top Fan thing, what's it mean?

[quote][b][user]ATLien[/user][/b] said: I don't actually understand the new Top Fan thing, what's it mean?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:21
n/m

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: n/m[/quote]
Edited by a deleted user on 23 Aug 2004, 18:26

Permalink Quote
- HeavySnarker said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:23
oooh, i love this. artist listings for groups are back!!!

[quote][b][user]HeavySnarker[/user][/b] said: oooh, i love this. artist listings for groups are back!!![/quote]

Permalink Quote
- said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 18:38
Re: Re:

Quoth uvdude:
Quoth skunk_monk:
How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**
yeah

the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to.

get it?

Yup

[quote][b][user][/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth uvdude[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth skunk_monk[/b]: How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**[/quote] yeah the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to. get it?[/quote] Yup [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- lselway said...
- User
- 23 Aug 2004, 19:36
hmmm

Mine are just on the 17th of August. I've listened to about 500 tracks since then. I'm just glad I didn't lose any more than I did. I still love AS. :)

[quote][b][user]lselway[/user][/b] said: Mine are just on the 17th of August. I've listened to about 500 tracks since then. I'm just glad I didn't lose any more than I did. I still love AS. :)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- veneman said...
- Subscriber
- 23 Aug 2004, 20:08
Re: Re:

Quoth uvdude:
Quoth skunk_monk:
How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**
yeah

the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to.

get it?

I think there are still some problems with the database when i look at these numbers for instance: http://www.audioscrobbler.com/music/Miles+Davis/_/Blue+In+Green

Also, in my last played tracks there are several tracks with no Top Fans, no plays at all actually: http://www.audioscrobbler.com/music/superpitcher/_/Happiness+%28M.+Mayer+Remix%29
Is there still some munching to do? :)

[quote][b][user]veneman[/user][/b] said: [quote][b]Quoth uvdude[/b]: [quote][b]Quoth skunk_monk[/b]: How does the new Top Fans thing work anyhow? the 6/58 numbers - is it worked out on a percentage of what the person listens to? **scratches head**[/quote] yeah the first number is how high the artist is in the users profile, second number is how many songs of this artist he's listened to. get it?[/quote] I think there are still some problems with the database when i look at these numbers for instance: http://www.audioscrobbler.com/music/Miles+Davis/_/Blue+In+Green Also, in my last played tracks there are several tracks with no Top Fans, no plays at all actually: http://www.audioscrobbler.com/music/superpitcher/_/Happiness+%28M.+Mayer+Remix%29 Is there still some munching to do? :)[/quote]

Permalink Quote