September 9 site update

Page 8 of 10Prev 1... 6 7 8 9 10 Next

- CrybKeeper said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 13:43
E-Gitarrist said:
The new searchbar-thing is a nice idea but it's broken(more loadingtime and a transfer to the offline-page) and more unclear than the one the site used before. The new design is ok but looks too much like other sites.

PS: Is the last design available for the ff-addon stylish somewhere?

I agree totally. You have taken away the most unique and useful feature, LastFM's old search had available.

LOOK at these two images. The top one is what we now have and the bottom smaller image will fix it and put back the most useful search feature on the music net:

This will fix things:

Shaolin Temple of Boom: Official video for 'I Would Detsroy' @ LastFM Music: Skiye@LastFM, Ellsbeth@LastFM, ShaolinTempleOfBoom@LastFM, DigJelly@LastFM, ZeroKing@MySpace, Woolgather @ LastFM, Circa@LastFM(BillySherwood/AlanWhite), Lunarium@LastFM, The Cryb@MySpace.

[quote][b][user]CrybKeeper[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]E-Gitarrist[/user][/b] said: [B]The new searchbar-thing is a nice idea but it's broken(more loadingtime and a transfer to the offline-page) and more unclear than the one the site used before. The new design is ok but looks too much like other sites.[/B] PS: Is the last design available for the ff-addon stylish somewhere?[/quote] I agree totally. You have taken away the most unique and useful feature, LastFM's old search had available. LOOK at these two images. The top one is what we now have and the bottom smaller image will fix it and put back the most useful search feature on the music net: [IMG]http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr252/CrybKeeper/cuplou894dd.jpg[/IMG] [B][U]This will fix things:[/U][/B] [IMG]http://i489.photobucket.com/albums/rr252/CrybKeeper/cuplou894def.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

Permalink Quote
- WichitaQ said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 14:50
Babs_05 said:
what? what?? fantastic!! :Dyeah, scents of the old fm are coming :D

about IE6, well, why not put that yellow notification at the top when people on those browsers arrive on the page?
"This site might not works entirely on your browser, please consider upgrading your browser to its latest version"
number of people using those old browsers decreases and therefore number of the people/threads on the forums about the same issues with those browsers.

[quote][b][user]WichitaQ[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]Babs_05[/user][/b] said: what? what?? fantastic!! :D[/quote]yeah, scents of the old fm are coming :D about IE6, well, why not put that yellow notification at the top when people on those browsers arrive on the page? "This site might not works entirely on your browser, please consider upgrading your browser to its latest version" number of people using those old browsers decreases and therefore number of the people/threads on the forums about the same issues with those browsers.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Russ said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 14:52
@CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music.

I'm sorry you miss the lyrics feature - our stats show that so few users actually used it that it didn't make sense for us to keep it around.

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: @CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music. I'm sorry you miss the lyrics feature - our stats show that so few users actually used it that it didn't make sense for us to keep it around.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- namnatulco said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 15:43
Licensing fees for lyrics is quite crazy, anyway. It'd be nice to have it as an optional feature (so if I were an artist, I could put them somewhere), but the lack of them on the major artists will look ugly. Plus, seeing the tag state some artist pages are in, I'm guessing those lyrics would be full of garble and mistakes anyway.

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.

ze bunny! :O

[quote][b][user]namnatulco[/user][/b] said: Licensing fees for lyrics is quite crazy, anyway. It'd be nice to have it as an optional feature (so if I were an artist, I could put them somewhere), but the lack of them on the major artists will look ugly. Plus, seeing the tag state some artist pages are in, I'm guessing those lyrics would be full of garble and mistakes anyway.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- HodgeStar said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 15:45
WichitaQ said:
Babs_05 said:
what? what?? fantastic!! :Dyeah, scents of the old fm are coming :Dyeah, the weekly neighbours/friends now listening mashup on the dashboard, a seperate recommendation section for the inbox, the group recomendations hub, a sensible site navigation that don't need an uninspired symmetry breaking side bar and i can finally leave "bring back the old last.fm" and enter "bring forward real meta data moderation".

Russ said:
I'm sorry you miss the lyrics feature - our stats show that so few users actually used it that it didn't make sense for us to keep it around.well, most of the time you want to read the lyrics because it's a foreign language. can your US/CA stats reflect that?

[quote][b][user]HodgeStar[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]WichitaQ[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]Babs_05[/user][/b] said: what? what?? fantastic!! :D[/quote]yeah, scents of the old fm are coming :D[/quote]yeah, the weekly neighbours/friends now listening mashup on the dashboard, a seperate recommendation section for the inbox, the group recomendations hub, a sensible site navigation that don't need an uninspired symmetry breaking side bar and i can finally leave "[url=http://www.last.fm/group/Bring+back+the+old+Last.fm]bring back the old last.fm[/url]" and enter "bring forward real meta data moderation". [quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: I'm sorry you miss the lyrics feature - our stats show that so few users actually used it that it didn't make sense for us to keep it around.[/quote]well, most of the time you want to [u]read[/u] the lyrics because it's a foreign language. can your US/CA stats reflect that?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- blissard said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 15:54
Russ said:
@CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music.

Did I understand this correctly? It costs money to display lyrics? Licensing fees?

[quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: @CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music.[/quote] Did I understand this correctly? It costs money to display lyrics? Licensing fees?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- snyde1 said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 16:10
Lyrics are copyrighted works as well. They are licensable.

There is a Greasemonkey script that helps: see this thread.

Did I hear that right? Mondegreens - for the misheard word.
Like Odds? Can't get better than Even Odds!

[quote][b][user]snyde1[/user][/b] said: Lyrics are copyrighted works as well. They are licensable. There is a Greasemonkey script that helps: see [url=http://www.last.fm/group/Greasemonkeys/forum/35794/_/400779/_/10469692]this thread[/url].[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- blissard said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 16:26
I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.

[quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- akrde said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 16:45
blissard said:
I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.

Welcome to the crazy world of music biz.... ;-)

[quote][b][user]akrde[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.[/quote] Welcome to the crazy world of music biz.... ;-) [/quote]

Permalink Quote
- HodgeStar said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 16:58
akrde said:
blissard said:
I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.Welcome to the crazy world of music biz.... ;-) what's so crazy about it? displaying lyrics to provide a service that might leave a profit is like using others' lyrics in your song which becomes a hit. ..of course sometimes it is a Bitter Sweet Symphony :|

[quote][b][user]HodgeStar[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]akrde[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: I understand that you can't just use other artists' lyrics in your songs, but the fact that they are charging someone just to display them is plain crazy.[/quote]Welcome to the crazy world of music biz.... ;-) [/quote]what's so crazy about it? displaying lyrics to provide a service that might leave a profit is like using others' lyrics in your song which becomes a hit. ..of course sometimes it is a [track artist=The Verve]Bitter Sweet Symphony[/track] :|[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- blissard said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 18:03
HodgeStar said:
what's so crazy about it? displaying lyrics to provide a service that might leave a profit is like using others' lyrics in your song which becomes a hit. ..of course sometimes it is a Bitter Sweet Symphony :|

Hey don't come here with your good arguments! :P

So basically, as long as the site doesn't make money, it's ok?

[quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]HodgeStar[/user][/b] said: what's so crazy about it? displaying lyrics to provide a service that might leave a profit is like using others' lyrics in your song which becomes a hit. ..of course sometimes it is a [track artist=The Verve]Bitter Sweet Symphony[/track] :|[/quote] Hey don't come here with your good arguments! :P So basically, as long as the site doesn't make money, it's ok?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Russ said...
- Subscriber
- 11 Sep 2009, 18:23
blissard said:
Russ said:
@CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music.

Did I understand this correctly? It costs money to display lyrics? Licensing
fees?

It cost us money every time lyrics were displayed or searched for. We were also obliged to display these lyrics with a kind of Javascript DRM which prevented them from being indexed by search engines, and also stopped users from copy-and-pasting the lyrics.

If you want to read more about how tightly music publishers control their lyrics copyrights, the recent happenings on LyricsWiki are a good place to start.

[quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: @CrybKeeper: Unfortunately we've had to remove our lyrics feature in the USA and Canada. Licensing lyrics on the internet is even more crazy (and expensive) than licensing the actual music.[/quote] Did I understand this correctly? It costs money to display lyrics? Licensing fees?[/quote] It cost us money every time lyrics were displayed or searched for. We were also obliged to display these lyrics with a kind of Javascript DRM which prevented them from being indexed by search engines, and also stopped users from copy-and-pasting the lyrics. If you want to read more about how tightly music publishers control their lyrics copyrights, the recent [url=http://groups.google.com/group/lyricwiki-api/browse_thread/thread/733ccd919d654040?pli=1]happenings on LyricsWiki[/url] are a good place to start.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- alienstashtin said...
- User
- 11 Sep 2009, 19:54
I was asked to repost this here...

"I really do not like the new search feature, it lists three pages of well know titles. I one of the weirdos who likes underground, new and little known artists. How on earth can find them through the search feature now? I have no desire to listen to the top 3 pages of well know commercial stuff. please at least give us the option to search 200 pages of stuff for the obscure gem again."

[quote][b][user]alienstashtin[/user][/b] said: I was asked to repost this here... "I really do not like the new search feature, it lists three pages of well know titles. I one of the weirdos who likes underground, new and little known artists. How on earth can find them through the search feature now? I have no desire to listen to the top 3 pages of well know commercial stuff. please at least give us the option to search 200 pages of stuff for the obscure gem again."[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- gwalla said...
- User
- 12 Sep 2009, 02:18
padlockgoo said:
Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever!Like this:

[quote][b][user]gwalla[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]padlockgoo[/user][/b] said: Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever![/quote]Like this: [URL=http://img12.imageshack.us/i/oldlastfm.png/][IMG]http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/8846/oldlastfm.th.png[/IMG][/URL][/quote]

Permalink Quote
- SM07 said...
- Subscriber
- 12 Sep 2009, 09:04
I like the new header, great job guys.

Only thing that bothers me is that the search box seems very cramped while the Profile, Inbox and Log Out links have plenty of room.
Here's a quick mockup:

[quote][b][user]SM07[/user][/b] said: I like the new header, great job guys. Only thing that bothers me is that the search box seems very cramped while the Profile, Inbox and Log Out links have plenty of room. Here's a quick mockup: [img]http://i25.tinypic.com/6j1wyo.jpg[/img][/quote]

Permalink Quote
- akrde said...
- Subscriber
- 12 Sep 2009, 09:10
gwalla said:
padlockgoo said:
Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever!Like this:

Looking at this feels like coming home...still missing it!

[quote][b][user]akrde[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]gwalla[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]padlockgoo[/user][/b] said: Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever![/quote]Like this: [URL=http://img12.imageshack.us/i/oldlastfm.png/][IMG]http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/8846/oldlastfm.th.png[/IMG][/URL][/quote] Looking at this feels like coming home...still missing it![/quote]

Permalink Quote
- HodgeStar said...
- User
- 12 Sep 2009, 11:51
blissard said:
So basically, as long as the site doesn't make money, it's ok?judging from what happend at LyricsWiki it seems that some think it's not ok.

Russ said:
It cost us money every time lyrics were displayed or searched for. We were also obliged to display these lyrics with a kind of Javascript DRM which prevented them from being indexed by search engines, and also stopped users from copy-and-pasting the lyrics.thanks for the info, Russ. It might sound crazy and off-topic, but this reminds me of the discussion about album covers before we were allowed to upload them. Does that mean you have a deal and pay for every album cover picture you display? And even more crazy is that the reason why you resample certain formats to lower quality - perhaps in order to somehow comply with "fair use"? Is it just me drawing crazy conclusions? ...sorry i don't want to hijack the thread but a short answer to this would help to understand some riddles of your cdn. thanks :)

[quote][b][user]HodgeStar[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]blissard[/user][/b] said: So basically, as long as the site doesn't make money, it's ok?[/quote]judging from what happend at LyricsWiki it seems that some think it's not ok. [quote][b][user]Russ[/user][/b] said: It cost us money every time lyrics were displayed or searched for. We were also obliged to display these lyrics with a kind of Javascript DRM which prevented them from being indexed by search engines, and also stopped users from copy-and-pasting the lyrics.[/quote]thanks for the info, Russ. It might sound crazy and off-topic, but this reminds me of the discussion about album covers before we were allowed to upload them. Does that mean you have a deal and pay for every album cover picture you display? And even more crazy is that the reason why you resample certain formats to lower quality - perhaps in order to somehow comply with "fair use"? Is it just me drawing crazy conclusions? ...sorry i don't want to hijack the thread but a short answer to this would help to understand some riddles of your cdn. thanks :)[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- adamzZz said...
- Subscriber
- 12 Sep 2009, 12:29
SM07 said:
I like the new header, great job guys.

Only thing that bothers me is that the search box seems very cramped while the Profile, Inbox and Log Out links have plenty of room.Your idea of new header looks much better than the present one.

[quote][b][user]adamzZz[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]SM07[/user][/b] said: I like the new header, great job guys. Only thing that bothers me is that the search box seems very cramped while the Profile, Inbox and Log Out links have plenty of room.[/quote]Your idea of new header looks much better than the present one.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Babs_05 said...
- Subscriber
- 12 Sep 2009, 14:35
akrde said:
gwalla said:
padlockgoo said:
Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever!Like this:

Looking at this feels like coming home...still missing it!haha that's exactly what it feels like! Looking at that old design does feel like coming home. *sigh* I miss it so much too. It was so lovely.

@SM07 - I think they're planning on using that space below the 'line' for site announcements etc. (not absolutely sure, but I think they'll go there)

@alienstashtin - agree, we need to be able to search all of Last.fm.

NNME Jan NNME Archives My Gang Albums 10 Chiller Cabinet Arctic Circle

irepli - mobile internet search Central Point: where artists and listeners meet
Reco Of The Week Animal Collective - My Girls

❉ Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! ❉

[quote][b][user]Babs_05[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]akrde[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]gwalla[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]padlockgoo[/user][/b] said: Hey, what does the pre-beta look like then? I love the header.. my favourite website header ever![/quote]Like this: [URL=http://img12.imageshack.us/i/oldlastfm.png/][IMG]http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/8846/oldlastfm.th.png[/IMG][/URL][/quote] Looking at this feels like coming home...still missing it![/quote]haha that's exactly what it feels like! Looking at that old design does feel like coming home. *sigh* I miss it so much too. It was so lovely. @SM07 - I think they're planning on using that space below the 'line' for site announcements etc. (not absolutely sure, but I think they'll go there) @alienstashtin - agree, we need to be able to search all of Last.fm.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- catachresistant said...
- User
- 12 Sep 2009, 19:21
BUT THAT WOULD BE AN ERROR

On the community page, the "newest" group link leads to the "active" group page.

Dunno if anyone's mentioned this before.
I mean I'd read the thread.
But.
You know.

[quote][b][user]catachresistant[/user][/b] said: On the community page, the "newest" group link leads to the "active" group page. Dunno if anyone's mentioned this before. I mean I'd read the thread. But. You know.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- maz35 said...
- Subscriber
- 12 Sep 2009, 19:26
Re: BUT THAT WOULD BE AN ERROR

catachresistant said:
On the community page, the "newest" group link leads to the "active" group page.

Dunno if anyone's mentioned this before.
I mean I'd read the thread.
But.
You know.
I've noticed that too, the page does exist though:

http://www.last.fm/community/groups/recent

The Tag Appreciation Society | The Last.fm Mass Tagger

[quote][b][user]maz35[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]catachresistant[/user][/b] said: On the community page, the "newest" group link leads to the "active" group page. Dunno if anyone's mentioned this before. I mean I'd read the thread. But. You know.[/quote] I've noticed that too, the page does exist though: http://www.last.fm/community/groups/recent[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- hippiedrow said...
- User
- 12 Sep 2009, 19:44
Re:About the Search Results

SombreFloe said:
Yes, they look better; but the practicality of the old search is lost.

1- It was better with the dropdown menu so that we could select first if we wanted to search specifically for a track, tag, artist, or just generally. In this one, we have to do that after we go to the search results page.

2- Also, please keep showing the listener numbers next to the results. Without them, there is no way to know how popular a song/artist/album is except by clicking and navigating away.

I agree. Without listing the amount of listeners being displayed, there is no way to know how popular it is.

Something that I used to utilize the search for, was to correct minor formatting differences, (For example:Blessed Are The Sick - Leading The Rats vs. Blessed Are The Sick / Leading The Rats). One of the advantages that last.fm has is to discern which of the two formats is correct by comparing the amount of listeners and going with the more populer version. This gives me more accuracy then other metadata and tracklisting entities such as Musicbrainz and Rate Your Music.

It would be great if this was brought back.

this frozen earth of greats relative to true desire for the notes and, it is which they stood still maintenance including but not limited to the potatoes and the carrots and other wonderful vegetables of root. we to search for forever the harvest of quality during the years, but nourishment and protection from the ashes of hunger, it give us. harvest Ô kind-hearted, to be blessed and could, it no not similarly on to correspondence and to triumph, it was which necessary to contemplate, but stoic of valor grounded into the frozen earth of old.

[quote][b][user]hippiedrow[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]SombreFloe[/user][/b] said: Yes, they [i]look[/i] better; but the practicality of the old search is lost. 1- It was better with the dropdown menu so that we could select first if we wanted to search specifically for a track, tag, artist, or just generally. In this one, we have to do that after we go to the search results page. 2- Also, [b]please[/b] keep showing the listener numbers next to the results. Without them, there is no way to know how popular a song/artist/album is except by clicking and navigating away.[/quote] I agree. Without listing the amount of listeners being displayed, there is no way to know how popular it is. Something that I used to utilize the search for, was to correct minor formatting differences, (For example:[track artist=Morbid Angel]Blessed are the Sick - Leading the Rats[/track] vs. [track artist=Morbid Angel]Blessed are the Sick / Leading the Rats[/track]). One of the advantages that last.fm has is to discern which of the two formats is correct by comparing the amount of listeners and going with the more populer version. This gives me more accuracy then other metadata and tracklisting entities such as Musicbrainz and Rate Your Music. It would be great if this was brought back.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- Bryneth said...
- User
- 13 Sep 2009, 16:06
strange problem

I'm using firefox 3.5.3 and i get this very strange effect

Mousing over the top options causes the coloured background to reappear for that option, but then goes back to the grey background when i move the pointer away again. Exactly the same effect happens with the black theme too.

I've tried disabling all my add-ons and plugins, but nothing makes any difference.

In the error console in firefox, there's a whole host of warning messages about the css along the lines of:

Warning: Unknown property '-moz-opacity'. Declaration dropped.
Source File: http://cdn.last.fm/css/release-lastfm/140360/master.css
Line: 1096

Does this have anything to do with it? Is there some setting i've got in firefox that nobody else has? Are other people using FF3.5.3 successfully...?

[quote][b][user]Bryneth[/user][/b] said: I'm using firefox 3.5.3 and i get this very strange effect [URL=http://img34.imageshack.us/i/lastfmheader.jpg/][IMG]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/360/lastfmheader.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Mousing over the top options causes the coloured background to reappear for that option, but then goes back to the grey background when i move the pointer away again. Exactly the same effect happens with the black theme too. I've tried disabling all my add-ons and plugins, but nothing makes any difference. In the error console in firefox, there's a whole host of warning messages about the css along the lines of: [i]Warning: Unknown property '-moz-opacity'. Declaration dropped. Source File: http://cdn.last.fm/css/release-lastfm/140360/master.css Line: 1096[/i] Does this have anything to do with it? Is there some setting i've got in firefox that nobody else has? Are other people using FF3.5.3 successfully...?[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- namnatulco said...
- Subscriber
- 13 Sep 2009, 18:36
Re: strange problem

Bryneth said:
I'm using firefox 3.5.3 and i get this very strange effect

Mousing over the top options causes the coloured background to reappear for that option, but then goes back to the grey background when i move the pointer away again. Exactly the same effect happens with the black theme too.

I've tried disabling all my add-ons and plugins, but nothing makes any difference.

In the error console in firefox, there's a whole host of warning messages about the css along the lines of:

Warning: Unknown property '-moz-opacity'. Declaration dropped.
Source File: http://cdn.last.fm/css/release-lastfm/140360/master.css
Line: 1096

Does this have anything to do with it? Is there some setting i've got in firefox that nobody else has? Are other people using FF3.5.3 successfully...?
Force a refresh (hold CTRL, press F5). A page or so back, someone posted a similar screenshot, and I think it worked for him. I'm running it on FF3.5.3 with no issues.

If that doesn't work, clear your cache.

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.

ze bunny! :O

[quote][b][user]namnatulco[/user][/b] said: [quote][b][user]Bryneth[/user][/b] said: I'm using firefox 3.5.3 and i get this very strange effect [URL=http://img34.imageshack.us/i/lastfmheader.jpg/][IMG]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/360/lastfmheader.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Mousing over the top options causes the coloured background to reappear for that option, but then goes back to the grey background when i move the pointer away again. Exactly the same effect happens with the black theme too. I've tried disabling all my add-ons and plugins, but nothing makes any difference. In the error console in firefox, there's a whole host of warning messages about the css along the lines of: [i]Warning: Unknown property '-moz-opacity'. Declaration dropped. Source File: http://cdn.last.fm/css/release-lastfm/140360/master.css Line: 1096[/i] Does this have anything to do with it? Is there some setting i've got in firefox that nobody else has? Are other people using FF3.5.3 successfully...?[/quote] Force a refresh (hold CTRL, press F5). A page or so back, someone posted a similar screenshot, and I think it worked for him. I'm running it on FF3.5.3 with no issues. If that doesn't work, clear your cache.[/quote]

Permalink Quote
- fmera said...
- Subscriber
- 14 Sep 2009, 03:05
...or just go directly to the master.css file and refresh that. i don't think the -moz-opacity property is the problem here - it's just one of several proprietary ones that firefox uses.

U.G.L.Y. - changing the face of music, one artist at a time.

[quote][b][user]fmera[/user][/b] said: ...or just go directly to the [code][url=http://cdn.last.fm/css/release-lastfm/140360/master.css]master.css[/url][/code] file and refresh that. i don't think the [code]-moz-opacity[/code] property is the problem here - it's just one of several proprietary ones that firefox uses.[/quote]

Permalink Quote